Showing posts with label chancery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chancery. Show all posts

Monday, December 20, 2021

In Chancery: Notice of Deposition: McNair/Lipsicomb (1867)

Alexandria Gazette (Va)
18 March 1867

TO CLARA McNAIR AND HER HUSBAND, name unknown, Stephen McNair, Fred. McNair, Henry McNair, Robt. McNair, Dolph McNair, Geo. W. Brent, and Francis J. Cannon, Sheriff of Prince William Co., Committee Administrator of John McNair, deceased,

Take notice, that I shall, on the 15th day of April, 1867, at the law office of Aylett Nicol, in the town of Brentsville, Prince William Co., Va., between the hours of 6 a.m. and 6 p.m., of that day, proceed to take the depositions of WM. E. LIPSICOMB and others, to be read as evidence in my behalf. in a certain suit in equity, depending in the Circuit Court for the said county of Prince William, wherein I am plaintiff and you are defendants; and if from any cause the taking of the said depositions be not commenced on that day, or if commenced be not concluded on that day, the taking of the same will be adjourned and continued from day to day, or from time to time, at the same place and between the same hours, until the same shall be completed.

FRANCIS A. T. DAVIS

Prince William Co., Va., Mar. 12--law4w




Saturday, June 26, 2021

Newspaper Tidbit: Land Sales

Alexandria Gazette (Va)
10 December 1887

LAND SALES.

Mr. J. F. Milstead has purchased at public sale, in the chancery suit of Milstead against Milstead, a tract of land near Minneville, Prince William county, containing 199 acres, for $2 per acre.

The Hutchinson tract, near Hickory Grove, in the same county, containing 186 acres has been sold to Mr. Henry Lynn for $8 per acre. 



Monday, April 12, 2021

Legal Notice: Thomas v. Farrow (1850)

Alexandria Gazette
14 December 1850

MESSRS. George Dye and John Hore, survivors partners of the late firm of George Dye & Co -- Take notice, that on the 13th day of January, 1851, I shall proceed to take the deposition of Daniel Ratcliffe, at his office, in the city of Washington, between sunrise and sunset of that day, and on the 17th day of January, 1851, I shall proceed to take the deposition of Washington H. Norville, at his mill in the County of Prince William, between sunrise and sunset of that day; which depositions are to be read as evidence on the trial of a suit in chancery now depending in the Circuit Court of Prince William County, in which I am plaintiff, and you and Thomas M. Farrow, and Walker P. Conway, administrator of John M. Conway, jr., deceased, and Seymour Lynn, administrator of Samuel Tansill, deceased, are defendants; and the taking of said depositions, will respectively be continued, if necessary, from day to day, till they are both closed. --

Yours, &c.
WILEMAN THOMAS
Prince William county, dec 9 -- law4w



Wednesday, June 17, 2020

Wedding Wednesday: Elizabeth A. (Bessie) Leachman/John L. Elliott

DIOCESE OF MARYLAND

CHURCH OF THE EPIPHANY,
Washington, D.C.

This is to Certify that on the Twenty Seventh day of October in the year of Our Lord, One Thousand Eight Hundred and Eighty Eight at Epiphany Church in the City of Washington D.C.

joined together in 
HOLY MATRIMONY

John L. Elliott and
Bessie A. Leachman

according to the Rites of the 
Protestant Episcopal Church

in the United States of America, and in Conformity with
the Laws of the District of Columbia.

Arthur S. Phelps
Assistant Minister




[Bessie Leachman was the daughter of John T. Leachman.  In 1900 she sued for and won divorce from her husband, John Elliott, on grounds of abandonment.  She was awarded $20,000 as alimony and reimbursement of her legal fees.  Three children were born of the union:  Bettie Lewis Elliot "who will be eleven years of age in January," John Love Elliot (9 years old in 1900), and "Nan Leachman Elliot who was born in Sept. 1896 and died during July 1897."  Bessie was given uncontested custody of her two children.]

Monday, May 18, 2020

In Chancery: Trustees of Saint Paul's Episcopal Church

Library of Virginia
Prince William County Chancery ID 1910-34

Gainesville, Va.
April 4th 1910

My dear George,

The enclosed transcription is part of the minutes of our Vestry Meeting on June 14th 1909 relating to our Church Trustees.  The question of having Trustees appointed to hold the Church property in the Parish was discussed, and as Mr. Thos. J. Chew was the only trustee living in the parish, Major A. H. Johnson having moved away, George G. Tyler was elected in his place and Mr. M. Cave was elected as the third Trustee.  The Secretary was directed to write to Major Johnson giving him the reason why it was desirable to have trustees living in the Parish.

On the 21st June 1909 the following was entered on the Minutes "Mr. C. E. Jordan was still a Trustee and on Motion Mr. Cave's name was withdrawn as one of those to be recommended to the Judge of the Court for appointment."

I hope the above is all Sufficient.

Yours sincerely,

ASE Thorp






In the matter of appointing trustees of St. Paul's Episcopal Church, at Haymarket, Prince William County, Virginia.

It appearing to the court by proper authority of St. Paul's Episcopal Church, of Haymarket, Virginia, that George G. Tyler was elected in the room and stead of Major A. H. Johnson, resigned, as one of the trustees to hold legal title to said religious denomination's property, in conjunction with C. E. Jordan and Thomas J. Chew, therefore, it is ordered that George G. Tyler be, and he is hereby appointed trustee in the room of Major A. H. Johnson, resigned, to hold legal title to said denomination's property in conjunction with C. E. Jordan and Thomas J. Chew.

1910 April 11 Entered

Friday, September 7, 2018

Friend of Friends Friday: Tansill Promissory Note

Library of Virginia Chancery Collection (Index No. 1858-030)
Culpeper, Va 
Thomas W. Tansill v. Seymour Lynn (1858)

We the undersigned promise & oblige ourselves and our & each of our heirs excr's & admrs to pay or cause to be paid to Elijah Hansbrough or assigns the just & full sum of Twenty Dollars for the services of Maryann the year 1846 to clothe Maryann with good & sufficient summer & winter clothing including a blankett, & in like manner we bond ourselves not to transfer Maryann to any person whatever or suffer her to be carried out of this state without the counsel of her master under the penalty of double her value, but treat her with humanity & return her (if alive) with her winter clothing good on or before the 25th December 1846 with the said wages given under our hand & seals this 1 Jany 1860.

Samuel Tansill {seal}
W. Charles Merchant {seal}


Friday, March 2, 2018

Newspaper Tidbit: Rose Hill

Alexandria Gazette
6 July 1842

COMMISSIONER'S SALE OF LAND

Under the authority of a decree of the Circuit Superior Court of Law and Chancery of Prince Wm. county, Va., pronounced in the suit of John Lloyd vs. Margaret S. Chapman, John G. Chapman and Wm. Herbert, I will offer for sale, by public auction, for ready money, on Saturday the 13th day of August next, (being the second Saturday in that month) before the front door of Mrs. Merchant's Tavern, in the town of Dumfries, at 12 o'clock, M. the following pieces, or parcels of land, that is to say: --

150 acres of land (more or less) called "Rose Hill," 38 1/4 acres of marsh; 30 acres which were conveyed to Thomas Chapman, deceased, by Bertrand Ewell and Jesse Ewell; one undivided fourth part of 300 acres on Powell's Run; also one undivided fourth part of 225 acres, commonly called "Young's Tract," and one undivided fourth part of 78 acres, purchased by Chapman from Foxworthy.

The above described land is in the immediate neighborhood of Dumfries in the County of Prince William, in Va.

The undersigned, selling as commissioner will convey such title only as vested in him by the decree of the Court.

BERNARD HOOE
Commissioner


Saturday, February 7, 2015

In Chancery: Haliday v. adm. of George H. Cockrell

Alexandria Gazette
6 July 1859

IN PRINCE WILLIAM CIRCUIT COURT, May 10th, 1859, James F. Haliday, plaintiff, against Samuel Cockrell, William G. Brawner, adm'r. of George H. Cockrell, dec'd., Sarah Ann Cockrell, William C. Harvey and Catharine his wife, Samuel D. Cockrell, George H. Cockrell, William Cockrell, Elizabeth Cockrell, Charles W. Cockrell, Joseph Cockrell, Sarah Cockrell, and Georgiana Cockrell, the last seven infants by guardian ad litem, defendants -- In Chancery.

The Court doth appoint Milton Fitzhugh, Clerk of t his Court, guardian ad litem of the infant defendants, George H., William, Elizabeth, Charles W., Joseph, Sarah, and Georgiana Cockrell; and thereupon the said infants, by their said guardian ad litem, filed their answer, and the plaintiff having proceeded in the mode prescribe by law against the absent defendants, Samuel Cockrell, William C. Harvey and Catharine his wife, George H. Cockrell, and Elizabeth Cockrell, and the bill having been taken for confessed as to the adult home defendants, William G. Branwer, adm'r. of George H. Cockrell, dec'd., Sarah Ann Cockrell, and Samuel D. Cockrell, upon whom process has been regularly served, and the cause set for hearing, this cause came on to be heard upon the bill and exhibits, and was argued by counsel; on consideration whereof the Court doth adjudge, order, and decree, that one of the Commissioners of the Court do state, settle, and adjust the account of William G. Brawner, adm'r., of George H. Cockrell, dec'd.; that he take an account of the debts due by the intestate George H. Cockrell; tha the take an account of all real estate of which said intestate died seized or entitled to; and that he inquire into and ascertain the amount and aggregate value of said real estate; that the Commissioner give notice of the day of his commencing to take the accounts and make the enquiries directed by this decree, by publication of a copy thereof once a week for four successive weeks in the Prince William Democrat, a newspaper published at Brentsville, in this County, or in the Alexandria Gazette, a newspaper published in the town of Alexandria, Virginia, pursuant to the set of Assembly, in such case made and proved; and said Commissioner will report his action under this decree to the Court, with any matter specially stated he may deem pertinent, or any party may require to be so stated.

A copy -- Teste:  M. FITZHUGH, Clerk


[Publication of chancery cases can offer up a wealth of information. Take the above case, which specifies "William C. Harvey and Catharine his wife" and also names the "infant defendants, George H., William, Elizabeth, Charles W., Joseph, Sarah, and Georgiana Cockrell."  ~cgl]

Saturday, June 28, 2014

In Chancery: Publication Notice: Carter v Lynn

Administrators of Thomas Carter v Administrators of Seymour Lynn
Prince William County, Virginia
Library of Virginia Case 1878-001
Order of Publication

Warrenton, Fauquier County, Va

I, L. W. Caldwell, one of the proprietors of the "True Index" a newspaper published in Warrenton, Va., do certify that the Order, of which the annexed is a copy, in the case of Carter's Admx v James Lynn was duly published in said newspaper once a week for four successive weeks, commencing on 21st day of November 1868 and that a copy of the same was posted at the front door of the Court-house of Prince William County, on the first day of ______ County Court, 186___.

Given under my hand this 9th day of January, 1869

L. W. Caldwell
Printer's Bill $10.70

---------------

In Prince William Circuit Court, October 14th , 1868.

Rachel Carter, Administratrix of Thomas Carter deceased, plaintiff,

Against

James S. Lynn, Administrator of Seymour Lynn deceased, William E. Goodwin, Sheriff of Prince William county, Committee Administrator de bonis non of Charles E. Norman deceased, Mary F. Norman, Andrew Norman, Fielder Norman, Mildred Norman, Eppa Norman, Charles E. Norman, Lycurgus F. Lynn, and James S. Lynn, Administrators of Marshall D. Lynn deceased, defendants

IN CHANCERY

The Court doth adjudge and decree that James S. Lynn, Administrator of S. Lynn deceased do render before one of the Commissioners of this Court an account of S. Lynn as Administrator of Charles E. Norman deceased, and William E. Goodwin do also render before said Commissioner an account of his actings and doings on the said estate.  And that said Commissioner do also take an account of the outstanding debts of said Charles E. Norman deceased, and of any assets of said estate unadministered by the Administrator aforesaid; also an account of the real estate belonging to said estate with annual and fee simple value thereof, notice to be given for four weeks in some newspaper, shall be equivalent to personal service, and tha the convene the creditors of said estate by like notice and that he report to the Court.

An Abstract - Teste
John Camper, Clerk
Nicol p.q.

COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE, November 7th, 1868

To the creditors of Charles E. Norman deceased, and all other concerned:

Take notice that I shall on the 20th day of December 1868 at my office, in the town of Brentsville, proceed to execute the requirements of the decree from which the above is an abstract, when and where you are required to attend.  Given under my hand on the day first aforesaid, as Commissioner of said Court.

B. A. Sinclair





Friday, January 24, 2014

Friend of Friends Friday: In Chancery: Sale of Slaves and Land (1843)

Alexandria Gazette
December 2, 1843

SALE OF SLAVES AND LAND. -- Pursuant to a decree of the Circuit Superior Court of Law and Chancery for the County of Prince William, the undersigned will sell for cash on the first Monday in January next at Brentsville in said County the interest which was devised to Geo. A. Douglass, by George Tennil, in certain Slaves and Real Estae, or so much thereof as may be sufficient to satisfy a decree of said Court, pronounced on the 17th day of May, 1843, for the sum of $453.09 cents with interest on the same from the 13th of June, 1841, and six dollars and fifty-two cents costs, as also the costs of the suit in which said decree was pronounced and the expenses incident to the execution thereof.  The interest of said Douglass is the reversion in sundry Slaves, and a tract of Land in the County of Prince William, to take effect after the death of the widow of George Tennil, who is now far advanced in life.  The age of the life tenant together wiht a particular description of the property aforesaid will be made known on the day of the sale.

John W. Tyler, Comm'r.

nov 21 - eots


Friday, January 10, 2014

Friday's Faces From the Past: Cora Bell Beavers

Below is a photo found among the chancery papers of the 1918 PWCo divorce case between Cora E. Beavers v. Samuel T. Beavers.  Cora was accompanied by her younger brother, Robert, and neighbor, Willie Keys, on a trip to the big city -- Washington, DC -- and had a souvenir photo-postcard made of the event.  This postcard was later introduced by Samuel Beavers in a counterclaim that Cora was unfaithful to him and having an affair with Willie, which she denied.  The Court found in Cora's favor, granting the divorce.

Robert Luther Bell, Willie ("Wylie") Keys, and Cora Bell Beavers
1918



Monday, January 6, 2014

Amanuensis Monday: Grant of Administration: John H. Lynn

The following document can be found in the 1880 chancery case, Executors of Benson Lynn etc. v. John H. Lynn.  It proves that John H[enry] Lynn had the legal authority to determine the disposition of the property in the estate of his father, William Lynn.   Cordelia Lynn, who gives "security" in the document, is the wife of William and mother to John.

~ ~ ~ ~

In Prince William County Court October 2d 1865

Administration on the estate of William Lynn deceased is granted to John H. Lynn who thereupon took the oath of an administrator, together with Cordelia Lynn and William E. Lipscomb his Securities who justified as to their sufficiency entered into and acknowledged a bond in the penalty of one thousand dollars conditioned as the law directs.

A copy teste

M. B. Sinclair, clerk


Friday, August 9, 2013

Friend of Friends Friday: Account of Hires and Profits

One part of Exhibit A in the Chancery case of Adm. Of Hezekiah Fairfax etc. v. Margaret Fairfax, Widow (1858) (LVA Index No. 1858-001) is an “Account of the hires and profits of the slaves mentioned in the Deed from Hezekiah Fairfax to William Fairfax."

~ ~ ~

A

“Account of the hires and profits” of the slaves mentioned in the deed from Hezekiah Fairfax dec. to William Fairfax, from the death of said Hezekiah on, say, the 10th of October 1837, to the 1st of June, 1839, when it appear they were surrendered to the Plaintiff Davis, excepting John who ran away and was sold in Sept. 1838.

1839

Dolls. Cts.
June 1
1. hires and profits of Marion from 10 Oct. 1837 to 1 June 1839 – 1 yr. 7 mos. 20 days - @ $30 per annum on an average of that period
49.16

2. Do [ditto] of Hal “ @ $125
204.85

3. Do [of] Ally “ @ $14
22.94

4. Do [of] Cassey (& child) “ @ $19
31.13

5. Do [of] Dilly “ @ $30
49.16

6. Do [of] Cynthia “ @ $30
49.16

7 Do [of] Priscilla “ @ $30
49.16

8. Do [of] Betsey “ @ $17
27.86

9. Do “ John from 10 Oct. 1837 to 1 of Sept. 1838, when it appears he run away from Deft. [defendant] Wm. Fairfax – 10 mos. 20 days @ $75
66.66

Total amount of “hires and profits” – to carry interest on $66.66 from 1st of September 1838, and on the balance from this date
550.08

This sum agreed to be deducted by [---]
26.00


$524.68

Note – It appears that Hannah with her child Rose – Old Betty – Old Caty – who were of the slaves mentioned in the deed above referenced to, have been worth their victuals and clothes during the period of 1 yr. 7 mos. & 20 days above mentioned.



Exhibit A - Fairfax v. Fairfax
LVA Chancery Index No. 1858-001



Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Deed: Gray to St. Paul's Episcopal Church (Haymarket)

Deed
Gray to St. Paul’s Episcopal Church (Haymarket)
PWCo Deed Book 52, pg. 451

This deed made this 21 day of April 1904, between Sarah A. Gray and Ellen Gray, of the Town of Haymarket, Va., parties of the first part and C. E. Jordan, T.J. Chew and A.H. Johnson trustees of St. Pauls Episcopal Church at Haymarket, Va., parties of the second part.  Witnesseth:  That for and in consideration of the fact that the Kings Daughters and the Ladies Aid Society, the auxiliaries of the said Church, have supported, for a number of years, and are now supporting the parties of the first part, and in the further consideration of the sum of Five Dollars, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the said Sarah A. Gray and Ellen Gray have granted, bargained and sold and by these presents do grant, bargain, sell and convey, with general warranty, unto the said parties of the second part, trustees as aforesaid, all of their title and interest in the following described real estate, to wit:  All of that certain parcel or lot of ground lying and being situate in the Town of Haymarket, Prince William County, Va., and bounded and described as follows, All of that lot upon which a frame house is now standing, which said lot adjoins the lot sold by John Barnett and wife to John Maddux, which said two lots are bounded as follows: Beginning at the corner of Lafette and Franklin streets and running S.W. with Layfette street 250 feet, thence S.E. 175 feet, with William street, thence N.E. 250 feet to Franklin street, thence N.W. 175 feet with Franklin street to the beginning, which said two lots are described in the plan of the said Town as Lots Nos. 107 and 116; and for a more particular description of the said lot reference is made to Deed Book No. 8, page 130, of the land records of said county.  This is the same property upon which the parties of the first part now reside.

Witness the following signatures and seals.

Sarah A. Gray {seal}
Ellen Gray {Seal}

State of Virginia
County of Prince William, to wit:

I , T. E. Garnett, a justice of the peace for the county aforesaid in the State of Virginia do certify that Sarah A. Gray and Ellen Gray, whose names are signed to the writing hereto annexed, bearing date, the 21st day of April 1904, have acknowledged the same before me in my county aforesaid.

Given under my hand this 22nd day of April 1904

T. E. Garnett J. P. [signed]

 ~ ~ ~ ~

Manassas Democrat – December 16, 1909

Virginia:  In the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court – Court of Prince William County, in vacation, the 15th day of December, 1909.

Bailey Taylor and Eugene Keyser,
vs.
C.E. Jordan, T.J. Chew and Geo. G. Tyler, trustees of Saint Paul’s Episcopal Church, at Haymarket, Virginia, Martha M. Stille and --- Stille, her husband; Emma Cologne and Don Cologne, her husband; Hamilton Clarke and James D. Shirley

IN CHANCERY.

Memo:  The general object of the above styled suit is to make sale of a certain lot or parcel of land lying and being situate in the town of Haymarket, Prince William County, Virginia, bounded by Lafayette, Franklin and Williams streets, being a lot 175 x 250 feet, with improvements thereon, and of which the late John R. Shirley died seized and possessed, and belonging to the said Saint Paul’s Episcopal Church, at Haymarket, Virginia, Martha M. Stille, Emma Cologne, Hamilton Clark and James D. Shirley, and divide the proceeds thereof amongst the parties entitled thereto.

[The case came to Chancery because there was some question as to who actually owned the above-referenced parcel of land and who had (or didn't have) the right to sell it to the Church.  (LVA Chancery Index No. 1910-035, Original Case No. 46) ~cgl]

Friday, June 28, 2013

Friend of Friends Friday: Fairfax to Fairfax Bill of Sale

Prince William County Chancery
LVA Index 1858-001
Adm of Hezekiah Fairfax v Margaret Fairfax, widow

Exhibit A
Deed Gifts – Fairfax to Fairfax

Know all men by these presents that I Hezekiah Fairfax Sr. of the County of Prince William & State of Virginia for and in consideration of the sum of Four thousand dollars to me in hand paid by William Fairfax Jr. of the County and State aforesaid at and before the sealing and delivery of these presents the receipt where of I do hereby acknowledge have bargained sold granted and confirmed and by these presents do bargain sell grant & confirm to the sd. William Fairfax Jr. sundry Negroes to wit Caty, Tholemiah, Jesse, Casander, Fanny, John, Maria, Seyntha and their increase forever; also, Betsy, Hannah, Deliea, Henry, Eliza, Alice, Priscilla, William, Presly and their increase forever. Together with three hundred and fifty acres of land lying in the County & State aforesaid and all household & kitchen furniture & all farming utensils of all descriptions, & all stocks of sheep, cattle viz. To have & to hold to the proper use & behoof of the said William Fairfax Jr. his Executors administrators and assigns forever and I the said Hezekiah Fairfax Sr. for myself & my executors and administrators. The above named negroes & their increase & all descriptions of property mentioned aforesaid to the said William Fairfax Jr. his Executors administrators and assigns against me the said Hezekiah Fairfax my Executors administrators and assigns and against all and any other person & persons whomsoever shall and will warrant & forever defend by these presents. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand & affixed my seal this 10th April 1826.

Hezekiah {X his mark} Fairfax {seal}

Sealed and delivered in the presence of
Silas Foster
William Selecman
Samuel H. Fisher

At a Court of quarterly sessions held for Prince William County June 5, 1826. This bill of sale from Hezekiah Fairfax Jr. to William Fairfax Jr. was proved by the oath of William Selecman & ordered to be certified and at a court of quarterly sessions contd. & held for said county June 6, 1826. This said bill of sale was fully proved by the oaths of Samuel H. Fisher & Silas Foster & admitted to record.

Teste. P. D. Dawe


A copy Teste Jn. Williams

Friday, May 11, 2012

Chancery: Long v. Long

In 1919, Gertrude A. (Penn) Long filed for divorce from her husband, Joseph S. Long, for abandonment.  Among the documents in this chancery case can be found the original certificate of marriage which gives the bride's maiden name, place of birth, and the marriage date of September 11, 1913.


In addition to the marriage certificate, the file contains the chancery notice published in the Manassas Journal, which includes the last known address of the AWOL defendant.


Other information found within the file included the name of the couple's only child, Hilda Long, who was born "about one year after" the marriage.

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Chancery Order of Publication

You've probably seen a few of these when browsing the Notices section of your local newspaper.  Then, as now, Chancery and other estate and court proceedings were published so that all parties could be made aware of the Order (especially if they were out of State or hard to locate).

This Order of Publication concerned a chancery case between James Lawrence Cole, Executor of Jane Cole, deceased (his mother and my gggreat-grandmother) versus S. B. Howell and M.C. Howell.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Marriage License: Edgar Lee Moler and Olive E. Long

This marriage license between Edgar Lee Moler and Olive E. Long, daughter of Simeon and Margaret Long of Independent Hill, was Exhibit A in a 1921 chancery case in Prince William County.  Mrs. Moler (aged 34) was suing for divorce from her husband because he "gambled and staid away from home all the time." 

Monday, March 28, 2011

Chancery documents

Think Chancery records are filled with boring old legal documents and correspondence between attorneys?  They're not!  You might be surprised by some of the documents that are made of record to prove a party's claims, like the following marriage license in the 1913 divorce case between Martha Davis and John H. Carter.

Davis Carter marriage license

It's a copy of the ornate license, which includes the names of the parents of both bride and groom. 

Chancery records might also hold bonds, deeds, wills, plats, and genealogies.

Saturday, February 5, 2011

PWCo. Chancery Records Online

For online digital collections, I highly recommend the Library of Virginia.  If you can't get to Richmond, LVA's Virginia Memory site is the next best thing to being there.  Here you can find links to records and scanned images of Revolutionary War Bounty Warrents, Confederate pension rolls, and more.

One link that I never tire of visiting is the Chancery Records Index.

What is a chancery cause?  To quote the LVA FAQ, "a chancery case was one that could not be readily decided by existing written laws. A judge, not a jury, determines the outcome of the case. These types of court documents are useful when researching genealogical information and land or estate divisions and may contain correspondence, lists of heirs, or vital statistics, among other items. Cases in chancery often address estate and business disputes, debt, the resolution of land disputes, and divorce."

The Chancery records for Prince William County in the collection cover the years 1804 to 1954 with scanned images available online.  It is searchable by surname or date range.

Searching the index and viewing the images is free.